DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARUNGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET :
Docket No. NR6581-14
2 Mar 1S
a
This is in reference to your application for correction of. your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 March 2015. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by Office of Chief of Naval
Operations memorandum.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material —
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
notwithstanding the comments contained in the advisory opinion,
concluded that your request did not warrant favorable action.
Your application claims “Respectfully request to change
paragraph 4 of my Back to Back Sea Duty Extension approval
message lump sum entitlement from $21,600 to $28,800.00...The
SDIP Eligibility Chart Monthly SDIP Rate change for Personnel _
Specialist (PS), E6.from $600 to $800 the same day as my Back to
Back Sea Duty Extension was sent to me from BUPERS Millington."
The Board found that per. PERS-40DD, your SDIP request was
approved 20 November 2013 but the message was not released until
Docket No. NR6581-14
9 December 2013.* OPNAV Policy Decision Memorandum (PDM) 008-13
dated 26 April 2013, states that “Eligible Sailors desiring
SDIP-B must submit their request for a Back-to-Back. sea tour 11
to 13 months prior to PST completion date.” The Board further
found that despite your SDIP request being approved, you
submitted your Enlisted Personnel Action Request (NAVPERS
1306/7) SDIP request on 4 November 2013, 10 months prior to your
prescribed sea tour ,(PST) vice the 11-13 as was required, since
your PRD at the time was September 2014. You transferred from
the command on 1:September 2014. Furthermore, the Board found
that your request to modify the approved SDIP amount from
$21,600. to $28,800 to be not within the parameters of-PDM 008-13
11-13 requirement.
Under these circumstances; the Board found that no relief is
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
+ Per the memorandum for record (Memo) dated 4 March 2015 concerning a conversation
between Mr. David Cash and Mr. Joseph Ferdinand which took place on 3 March 2015, Mr.
Ferdinand stated to Mr. Cash that “he received the Petitioner's back-to-back sea duty
request on or about 14 November 2013. Furthermore, he approved the request on 20
November 2013. The message was not published, however, until 9 December 2013.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7118 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130D/14U1467 of 4 November 2014, a copy of which is attached. However, the Board found that your orders to VP-45 had a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of November 2015.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6532 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Your application claims “The information that was available power point presentation that was located on the CMS/ID created > Incentive Pays Program Manager (PERS- 40 state en applying for Back-to-Back sea tour must submit their request 6-12 months prior to their original PRD.” However, the Board found that the OPNAV Policy Decision Memorandum (PDM)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2737 14
Sse Sileavewe= issued orders on 25 September 2013 to the USS HARRY S. TRUMAN before having received an approval for SDIP from Navy Personnel Command (NPC) .° c. On 25 November 2013 Petitioner applied to the Board to titlement to SDIP-B claiming -eve that the SDIP reguest would be approved per reference (b), and the orders released in September after my SDIP-B request approval.” See enclosure (1). These additional documents, however, failed to take Ato consideration the 4-6 months short of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5936 14
Petitioner claims that “ I reviewed the message about SDIP and found that I still qualify since I am not getting paid (Frocked) for E-6 and because of my promotion I can fulfill my orders and complete the minimum requirement of 24 months to be able to receive SDIP.” However, enclosure (1) is the only documentary evidence Petitioner submitted to support his claim of why he felt he was eligible for the SDIP. By the time Petitioner’s HYT was approved and he found out his HYT would only have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6533 14
You were advised via our letter dated 24 September 2013 (your case was Boarded 23 September 2013), that your aoplication had been denied. Documentary materials considered by the Board consisted of your applicaticn, together with all materials submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and pclicies. after careful and) conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board) found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to etablish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11163-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 December 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007300
The applicant states, in effect: * she reported to Camp Casey, Korea for a command-sponsored tour * per Military Personnel (MILPER) message number 11-145, dated 16 May 2011, and All Army Activities (ALARACT) message number 121/2013 (date time group (DTG) 071800 Zulu (Z) May 2013), she was authorized AIP * she did not receive AIP because of conflicting guidance in MILPER message number 14-037 dated 12 February 2014, which required the submission of a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) through...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005456
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records by showing he is authorized Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP) for service in the Republic of Korea (ROK) during the period 6 November 2013 through 5 November 2015. The applicant provides copies of: * Memorandum, subject: AIP-Korea, dated 6 April 2009 * MILPER Message 11-145, subject: Update to the AIP Program for Korea, dated 16 May 2011 * Memorandum, Eighth U.S. Army Command Policy Letter Number 53, subject: AIP Program for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00016-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, ‘and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. On 31 December 2008 Petitioner applied to the Board to correct his record to establish...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000238
Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). The applicant requests retroactive payment of Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP) for his 24 month assignment to Dongducheon, Korea effective 13 November 2013 as an exception to policy. The applicant provides: * an undated memorandum from Headquarters (HQ), 2nd Infantry Division, addressed to the Board subject: Retroactive AIP Program Korea for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 signed by the Commanding General with supporting documents * DA Form...